Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Gesell v. Cottonwood, City of et al
as 3:2024cv08090
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gesell
Defendant:
Cottonwood, City of, Tim Elinski, Jesus Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ellerbe v. Becca's Restaurant & Sports Lounge
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Sydney Ellerbe doing business as Wall Street World Inc.
Defendant:
Becca's Restaurant & Sports Lounge doing business as Scotty's Restaurant & Lounge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steen v. USA
as 4:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Scotty Ray Steen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC) Barra v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawrence Barra
Defendant:
Wilson, Ziegler and Scotti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Dicks et al v. Hawaii Republican Party, et al et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Karl Orlando Dicks, James Ryan Malish and Daniel Decker
Defendant:
Hawaii Republican Party, et al, Shirlene Ostrov, Lynne Finnegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Asher v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Scotty Asher
Defendant:
Rent-A-Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
