Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hayes v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07578
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas Hayes v. Facebook
as 19-16840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK
Hayes v. Facebook
as 3:2019cv02106
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
Facebook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Facebook et al
as 3:2019cv01297
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayes v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Henry Atencio, Shannon Cluney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00910
Plaintiff:
Neil Thomas Hayes, Jr
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hayes v. Page
as 1:2016cv00386
Petitioner:
Michael Thomas Hayes
Respondent:
Chad Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Independent Certified Emergency Professionals
as 2:2014cv01723
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Local 1 Independent Certified Emergency Professionals
Counter_claimant:
Joshua Barkley
Counter_defendant:
Thomas E Perez
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Joshua Barkley
Thirdparty_defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Thomas Hayes, Edward Oquendo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Rodny Bailey et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv07251
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp, Easton-Bell Sports Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kellie Bailey, Rodney Bailey, Stacy Bailey Bailey and others
Hayes et al v. Oro Valley, Town of et al
as 4:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Hayes and Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
Oro Valley, Town of, Daniel G Sharp, Unknown Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
