Cases 1 - 10 of 325
Serenity Araiza et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04600
Plaintiff:
SERENITY ARAIZA, RICHARD SAMUELSON, ASHLEY TURNER and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Canyon, LLC, Waste Connections Management Services, Inc. and Waste Connections US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101 Labor-Management Relations (Findings and Purpose)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2024cv05375
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Suchodolski
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro, Secretary, Department of the Navy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tee v. Shea et al
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Ignatius M Tee, Jr.
Defendant:
Shannon M Shea and Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CAT Scale Company v. Conico Toro, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03396
Plaintiff:
CAT Scale Company
Defendant:
Conico Toro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Donald W. Park v. United States et al
as 5:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Park
Defendant:
United States and Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erin Del Toro et al v. Crown Laboratories, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Erin Del Toro and Louisa Romo
Defendant:
Crown Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
