Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
RM White LLC v. Ramirez
as 5:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
RM White LLC
Defendant:
Eliseo Ramirez doing business as Lalo's Shoe Repair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Off-White LLC v. Afters Ice Cream, Inc.
as 8:2020cv02121
Plaintiff:
Off-White LLC
Defendant:
Afters Ice Cream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Off-White LLC v. Rastaclat LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv03518
Defendant:
RASTACLAT LLC d/b/a RASTACLAT, Zumiez Inc., THE FINISH LINE INC. d/b/a FINISH LINE and others
Plaintiff:
Off-White LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Federal Trade Commission v. Revmountain LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02000
Defendant:
Blair Mcnea, Absolutely Working LLC, Action Pro White LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Joshua Teeple
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Beaming White LLC et al v. Rabon et al
as 3:2016cv05858
Plaintiff:
Beaming White LLC and Luis Lajous
Defendant:
Jason Rabon and Jane Doe Rabon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Gold Value International Textile Inc v. Winston White LLC et al
as 2:2015cv09675
Defendant:
Does, Eminent Inc and Winston White LLC
Plaintiff:
Gold Value International Textile Inc
CrossFit Incorporated v. White et al
as 2:2012cv01746
Defendant:
Scott White, Personal Power Training by Scott White LLC and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
CrossFit Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Beaming White LLC et al v. Skymall Incorporated
as 2:2011cv01680
Plaintiff:
Beaming White LLC and Luis Lajous
Defendant:
Skymall Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
