Cases 231 - 240 of 22,091
Sexton v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sexton
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Tyler Collins
Defendant:
Larry Hatfield and Matt Spradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kelly v. Bennett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant:
Lt. Bennett, Joseph H. Headley and Warden Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Willison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
John William Herring, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Willison and Officer Frooster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Silena M. Dean
Defendant:
Kimberly L. Williams, Lifestyle Trucking, Inc. and Concordant Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dillon v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dillon
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kim Graham
Defendant:
Farmers New World Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
