Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Lindsay v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00399
Plaintiff:
Stephon Lindsay
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Warden Cummins, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Prison Health Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00351
Plaintiff:
Anthony Adams
Defendant:
Prison Health Services and Dr. Siddiq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00342
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Dean
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Richard Allen, B. Luke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Siddiq et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
Ronnie V. Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiq, Prison Health Services, W. Nalls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00266
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Officer Barnes, Captain Barrett, Linda Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Wylie McGee
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Michael E. Robbins, B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Prison Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Richard Allen, John Cummings, Harold Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00102
Plaintiff:
Agatha Harris
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Officer Munroe, Dr. Adam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
