Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Broughton v. Murphy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00780
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gerell Broughton
Defendant:
Victorrus Felder, Anthony L. Murphy and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. Collier (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2015cv00697
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Green , Brooke M. Walker and Earl E. Howton, Jr.
Defendant:
Spencer Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marbury v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00465
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Marbury
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marbury v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Marbury
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marbury v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00436
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Marbury
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Christopher Gordy and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey v. Britton (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00596
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Carey
Defendant:
Darren Britton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Danford et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00772
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Carey
Defendant:
Robert Danford, Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Fourth Quarter, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00921
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., Fantasy, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Fourth Quarter, Inc., Patrick J. Grider and Daniel Grider
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hicks v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00344
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Hicks
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Sherry Seals and Jameka Caffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Alabama Pardon & Paroles et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv01106
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Carey
Defendant:
Alabama Pardon & Paroles, Bill Wynn, Velinda Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.