Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Echenique v. Biden et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00534
Defendant:
Lamela Solomon, Julian Lennon, Joe Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Ivette T. Echenique
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dwight R. Coleman, Robert Earl Jackson Little, Jason Daniels and others
Defendant:
Larry Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Barrett et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2021cv00307
Plaintiff:
Willie Denoris McClendon
Defendant:
Barry Barrett and Staton Correctional Facility
Consolidated Defendant:
Michael Borowicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Carrie Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hood et al v. Veazey et al
as 2:2020cv00712
Defendant:
Mt. Hebron West Baptist Church, Crossroads Community Church, a Southern Baptist Fellowship, The State Board of Missions of The Alabama Baptist State Convention and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Rothlander and Mendy Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bicknell v. Wetumpka Sheriff's Department (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00833
Defendant:
Wetumpka Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
John Barrett Bicknell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Alabama State Department of Education et al
as 2:2018cv00565
Plaintiff:
Martin Brooks
Defendant:
Alabama State Department of Education , June Barrett and Perry Fulton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.