Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Southern Guaranty Insurance Company v. Robinson
as 1:2011cv00506
Plaintiff:
Southern Guaranty Insurance Company
Defendant:
William L. Robinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. Ryla Teleservices, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Chasity Robinson and Makelia Wingard
Defendant:
Ryla Teleservices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Bethel et al v. City of Bay Minette, Alabama et al
as 1:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
City of Bay Minette, Alabama, Jamie Tillery, Jonathan Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Alabama et al v. BP, PLC et al
as 1:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and CMCO, LLC
Defendant:
BP, PLC, BP Products North America, Inc., BP America and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robinson v. USA
as 1:2010cv00104
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christian Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fuller v. Barnes, et al
as 1:2009cv00839
Plaintiff:
David B. Fuller
Defendant:
Sgt. Canty, Officer Stoll, Officer Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Schwarzauer
as 1:2009cv00615
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
JoJo Schwarzauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers et al v. Automotive Computer Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00556
Plaintiff:
Retta Marlene Powers, Carol Anne Lombard, Deborah Robinson and others
Defendant:
Automotive Computer Services, Inc. and Express Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robinson v. Giles
as 1:2009cv00488
Petitioner:
Charles Robinson
Respondent:
J. C. Giles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
