Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Raymond v. Poinsett County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Heith Jonathan Raymond
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail, Susan Duffle, Elliot Nooner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nooner v. Arkansas et al
as 4:2019cv00389
Defendant:
Bill Webster, Cavaneal, Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Miller et al
as 4:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Harry F Barnes, Eastern District of Arkansas, James R Marschewjki and others
Petitioner:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nooner v. Miller et al
as 4:2019cv00194
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Defendant:
J Leon Holmes, J Thomas Ray, Kristine G Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson and Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGehee et al v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jason McGehee
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson and Wendy Kelley
Consol_plaintiff:
Stacey Johnson , Marcel Williams , Kenneth Williams and others
Amicu:
Fresenius Kabi USA LLC and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Terrick T Nooner
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelley, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas et al
as 4:2014cv00664
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Defendant:
United States District Court, Federal Public Defender Office, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nooner v. Norris
as 5:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
Terrick Terrell Nooner and Terrick Terrell Nooner
Defendant:
Larry Norris and Larry Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.