Cases 151 - 160 of 46,311
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Walmart Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Charles Swift
Defendant:
Walmart, Walmart Corporation and Shanita Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Pitts v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
L Watson, Haywood and Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tennessee, State of et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of, Alabama, State of and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ellis v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle and Does Lieutenant, E.A.R.U. Max; Mental Health Doctor, Central Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Jaad v. USA
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Rafeq Al-Jaad
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Food Stamp Act
Granado v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Joe Granado
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mumford et al v. Safelite Group Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Virginia Mumford and Brandon Mumford
Defendant:
Safelite Group Inc and Hunter Lee Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tolston v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Tolston
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
