Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Youngberg v. Gardner et al
as 4:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Charles J Youngberg
Defendant:
Roger Gardner, Brandon Long, Patricia Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swayze v. Marshall et al
as 4:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Joab Anthony Swayze
Defendant:
Zach Marshall, Josh Waldrum and Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Cash et al
as 4:2022cv01252
Plaintiff:
Kobie Joe Henson
Defendant:
Cash and Josh Lingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal et al
as 2:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Debbie Heathcock
Defendant:
Speed Intermodal, Srikanth Vangala, Freedom 1 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Shell v. Lingo et al
as 4:2022cv01121
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Shell
Defendant:
Josh Lingo, Lloyd Elkins, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlop v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Josh D Dunlop
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Perry v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Perry
Defendant:
Leonard Hogg, Amanda Rodgers, Chris Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catlett et al v. Eck & Glass Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Adam Catlett and Josh Bartlett
Defendant:
Eck & Glass Inc and Cummins Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Heredia v. Fallis et al
as 4:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
Cristobal P Heredia
Defendant:
Johnathan Fallis, Kenneth J Keough, Cody Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
