Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Patterson v. Hogg et al
as 4:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
David Patterson
Defendant:
Leonard Hogg, Clent Todd and Cody Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Glover
as 4:2021cv00700
Plaintiff:
David Lee Patterson, Sr
Defendant:
Cindy Glover, Leanard Hogg, Clent Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Triosim Coporation v. Drake
as 4:2020cv00395
Defendant:
A Dale Drake
Plaintiff:
Triosim Coporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walsberg et al v. Regions et al
as 3:2020cv00012
Defendant:
Paul Tierney, Jeff Beeker, Rhonda Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Zeborah C Walsberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingman et al v. Joseph et al
as 3:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Kingman and James Kingman
Defendant:
Transnet Freight Ltd and Charli Joseph
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nicholas Drake Adams and Kari Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams et al v. Joseph et al
as 3:2018cv00156
Defendant:
Transnet Freight Ltd and Charli Joseph
Plaintiff:
Kari Green and Nicholas Drake Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodman v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Wayne Goodman
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Denise M Love
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Denise Goodman
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Goodman
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Denise M Love, Denise Goodman and Wayne Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
