Cases 31 - 40 of 1,127
Markus v. Thyer et al
as 3:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Gentry Lee Markus
Defendant:
Cindy Thyer, Philip E Ferguson, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. Rose et al
as 4:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Snyder
Defendant:
Devon E Rose, Buttar Carrier Inc and Does John Does 1-3 and John Doe Entities 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robinson v. Kessel
as 2:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robinson
Defendant:
Doe and E Kessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hoskins v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Walter Hoskins
Defendant:
John P Yates and E Kessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nolan v. Edge
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Aldridge Nolan
Defendant:
USA, E Kessel and C Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Christopher v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Charles E Christopher
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pearson v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Pearson, III
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byard v. Conry et al
as 4:2023cv00190
Defendant:
William Bill Fisher, John P Conry, Bill Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
David E Byard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Wolgamott v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Chase E Wolgamott
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. JP Logistics Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Charles E Massey
Defendant:
JP Logistics Inc and Charles Camelot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
