Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Little Rock School et al v. Pulaski Cty School et al
as 4:1982cv00866
Plaintiff:
Little Rock School District , Dale Charles , Robert L Brown, Sr and others
Defendant:
North Little Rock School District , Pulaski County Board of Education , Pulaski County Special School District and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
North Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association , Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers , Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association and others
Intervenor:
Blytheville School District , Bryant School District , Fort Smith School District and others
Movant:
Northeast Arkansas School District
Respondent:
Arkansas Department of Education
Claimant:
Office of Desegregation Monitoring
Amicu:
Reedie Ray, Mark Perry and Ben E Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. Brown et al
as 4:2009cv00703
Plaintiff:
Decarlos Forte
Defendant:
Bobby Brown and K Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Forte et al
as 4:2009mc00012
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Joseph S Forte and Joseph Forte LP
Receiver:
Marion Hecht
Stine v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2008cv04193
Plaintiff:
Charles Stine
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Sebastian County Prosecutors Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter v. Beebe Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2007cv01032
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Carter
Defendant:
Beebe Arkansas, City of and Leonard Fort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones et al v. E-Z Mart Stores Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00246
Plaintiff:
Charles D Jones, Charles D Jones, Michael Gauthreaux and others
Defendant:
E-Z Mart Stores Inc, Flash Market Inc, Fort Smith Petroleum Equipment Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
