Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Dixon Ventures Inc v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2020cv01518
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Plaintiff:
Dixon Ventures Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Galvin v. Rosenbaum et al
as 4:2019cv00615
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Deborah Leff, Kevin Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Travis v. USA et al
as 2:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Robby Travis
Defendant:
USA, Charles Samuels, Harell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Flores v. U S Attorney General et al
as 4:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, Department of Health and Human Services and Sierra Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Donald A Bryant
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Board of Apportionment and Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Southeast Arkansas Hospice Inc v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 2:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Southeast Arkansas Hospice Inc
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
