Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Northcross v. Jackson, County of et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Defendant:
Jackson, County of, Danielle Lancaster and Rob Ratton
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Northcross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lancaster et al v. Thurston et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Randy Sams, Jeff Morse, Coty Powers and others
Defendant:
Joseph Wood and John Thurston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Dunn v. Hackney et al
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Robert V Dunn
Defendant:
Barbara Hackney and Danielle Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Sims et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Larry David Davis
Defendant:
Barry A Sims, Reese Lancaster, Anna Catherine Cargile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lancaster v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Uvie D Lancaster
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lancaster v. Adcock et al
as 4:2021cv00755
Plaintiff:
James P Lancaster
Defendant:
Edward G Adcock, Stark Ligon, Charles D Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Cargile et al
as 4:2021cv00426
Defendant:
Cargile, Barry A Sims, Beth C Kremers and others
Plaintiff:
Larry David Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. Ligon et al
as 4:2020cv00407
Defendant:
Edward Adcock, Stark Ligon, Cathleen Compton and others
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
