Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Lane v. Nadding et al
as 2:2017cv02056
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Adam Nadding and Joseph M Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. 2711 W. Garrett Road, Rogers, Arkansas et al
as 5:2017cv05020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2711 W. Garrett Road, Rogers, Arkansas and 64660 E 253 Lane, Grove, Oklahoma
Claimant:
Robert E. Rogers and Lori K. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Brann v. Garland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2016cv06075
Plaintiff:
Travis Brann
Defendant:
Garland County Sheriff's Department , Lane Mayo , Charles Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Assurance Company of America, Inc. v. Poff et al
as 4:2014cv04139
Plaintiff:
Assurance Company of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Franklin A. Poff, Jr., Allen Rogers, Lane Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2014cv02188
Plaintiff:
Janelle Lane
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Barbee v. Murphy et al
as 6:2014cv06082
Plaintiff:
Sylvester O Barbee
Defendant:
Lisbeth Anne Murphy, Wendy Kelley and Marie Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2014cv01029
Plaintiff:
Minnie Jean Lane
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2014cv02078
Plaintiff:
Candace Lane
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mitchell v. Sanders et al
as 6:2013cv06102
Plaintiff:
Justice A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Larry Sanders, Branstetter, John Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 5:2013cv05107
Plaintiff:
Janet Lane
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
