Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mayfield v. Raymond et al
as 3:2020cv03007
Defendant:
Captain Lewis, Sergeant Clay Maple, Corporal Ethan Raymond and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Raymond et al
as 3:2019cv03094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Eugene Mayfield
Defendant:
Sergeant Clay Maple, Captain Lewis, Corporal Ethan Raymond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Moody et al
as 6:2019cv06074
Defendant:
Parole Officer Nick Mayfield, Ruby Moody, Jamie Vandiver and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Beverly et al
as 3:2019cv03016
Defendant:
Parole Officer Nick Mayfield, Beverly and Jodi Higgins
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stompingbear v. Reed
as 6:2018cv06105
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dziedzic v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2018cv03050
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dziedzic
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Carroll County, Arkansas, Jededeliah Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Novak et al
as 3:2018cv03022
Plaintiff:
Desire Kristin Brown
Defendant:
Rebecca Novak , Kimberly Flowers, Mark Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman v. Williams et al
as 3:2017cv03001
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ray Hoffman
Defendant:
Williams, Randy Mayfield and Morrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emery v. Morgan et al
as 5:2016cv05239
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Emery
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Russell Alberts, Drew Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman v. Cribbs et al
as 3:2016cv03082
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ray Hoffman
Defendant:
Juan Cribbs and Randy Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
