Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Gerald A. Gauthier v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv01951
Plaintiff:
Gerald A Gauthier
Defendant:
3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Intervenor:
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Compay, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant:
DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
William Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
William Ollerton
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of AMPCO-Pittsburgh Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Fnc., individually and successor in interest to Buffalo Forge, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Stephen C. Peet v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06672
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Peet
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, Cleaver Brooks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Flowserve US, Inc.
as 2:2021cv08950
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Defendant:
Flowserve US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Benito C. Valdez, Jr. et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division et al
as 2:2021cv08863
Plaintiff:
Benito C. Valdez, Jr. and Georgia Valdez
Petitioner:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Copes-Vulcan, Inc.
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dennis A. Rockwell et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv03963
Defendant:
ViacomCBS Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC, Warren Pumps, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Rockwell and Dennis A Rockwell
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gary Stern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Janet E Carpenter et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2020cv11797
Plaintiff:
Brian H Carpenter, Tanya D Hardin, Teri D Carpenter and others
Defendant:
Warren Pumps, LLC, Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc., BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Petitioner:
Flowserve US Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Spirax Sarco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Douglas Wilber, et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, et al
as 2:2019cv04940
Plaintiff:
FAITH WILBUR, DOUGLAS WILBUR, Faith Wilber and others
Defendant:
Vigor Shipyards, Inc., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.), Elliott Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
