Cases 1 - 10 of 18
ERVIN v. HYSTER-YALE MATERIALS HANDLING INC et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, BRIGGS EQUIPMENT, BRIGGS EQUIPMENT INC and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD ERVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE 1 DOE, JANE 2 DOE, JANE 3 DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLER v. KIGHT et al
as 1:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
JACOB WALLER
Defendant:
SARGEANT JAMES KIGHT, SARGEANT JOHN LORD, CORRECTION OFFICERS JOHN I DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, I, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant:
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary U.S. DHS Xavier Becerra, Secretary Air Force Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS et al v. BAY COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 5:2021cv00001
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE JAIL DIVISION, BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TOMMY FORD and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE JACOBS, SR. and MATTHEW SHANE JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAINTLOT v. NEEL, et al
as 3:2020cv06013
Defendant:
NEEL, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 6 and others
Plaintiff:
ROLAND CARLY SAINTLOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHESTNUT v. SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 3:2020cv05918
Plaintiff:
GERNARD D CHESTNUT
Defendant:
WARDEN SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, DICE, SECRETARY OF DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. RAMOS et al
as 5:2020cv00191
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, I, RAMOS and JOHN 2 DOE
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. MCCRAINE
as 3:2020cv05462
Defendant:
T MCCRAINE, C CATTNACH, D DICE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
