Cases 71 - 80 of 466
Cisco v. Rumley et al
as 2:2021cv02176
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
David Rumley, Illinois State Police, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cisco v. State of Illinois
as 2:2021cv02156
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Cisco and Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Google, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03103
Defendant:
Larry Page, Greg Tseng, Android, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Dickerson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bartels et al v. Talbert et al
as 4:2021cv04012
Defendant:
Schuyler County, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, John A. Talbert and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Bartels, Joshua Bartels and John Bartels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Williams v. The People of the State of Illinois et al
as 3:2021cv03024
Defendant:
Leroy K Martin, Jr, Carol M Howard and The People of the State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Helene Tonique Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Salazar et al
as 2:2021cv02008
Defendant:
Dennis Gardner, Vermilion County Illinois, Stephane Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Keyvell Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2021cv01009
Defendant:
Kevin Keller, Illinois Department of Corrections, Mallorie Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Bednaco Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooding v. Kahl et al
as 3:2021cv03011
Defendant:
Mary Dumbacher, Macoupin County State of Illinois, Jennifer Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gooding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Minger et al
as 1:2020cv01460
Defendant:
City of Eureka Illinois, Michael L Stroh, Gregory Minger and others
Plaintiff:
Walter A Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
