Cases 51 - 60 of 386
Seawood v. Mackin
as 2:2021cv00376
Plaintiff:
Linda C. Seawood
Defendant:
Nancy J. Mackin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macchia v. Landline Trans, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
jeffrey macchia and Jeffery Macchia
Defendant:
Landline Trans, LLC and Tamas Rosenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Summers v. Crossroads Galvanizing, LLC
as 4:2021cv00074
Estate Plaintiff:
Cory J. Summers
Defendant:
Crossroads Galvanizing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
as 2:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Amy Rice
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. C T Corporation
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hamilton and Sandra L. Hamilton
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC and C T Corporation doing business as Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kesani v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Dr. Mohan K. Kesani and Mohan K. Kesani
Defendant:
Gregory Loomis, Tina L Nommay and United States of America The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowes-Northern v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc., et al
as 2:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc, Corie Barry, Andrew Bonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Biggs v. Riel et al
as 2:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
David Biggs
Defendant:
Richard Riel and American National Property and Casualty Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hahn v. Aziyo Biologics, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
David Hahn
Defendant:
Aziyo Biologics, Inc., Medtronic Inc, Medtronic PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold, Jr. v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
as 2:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arnold, Jr.
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. and Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
