Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Jane Magnus-stinson
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,940
WHITE v. BOOTS et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE
Defendant: MATTHEW BOOTS and BRIDGETT FOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: DARRICK WILLIAMS
Defendant: CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner: JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARD v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00012
Petitioner: TORY D. WARD
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner: ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WITHERSPOON v. TRINKLE et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: WILLIE JAMES WITHERSPOON, JR.
Defendant: ALICE TRINKLE, JASON JOBE, CHELSA HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROADWAY v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00571
Petitioner: MARCUS BROADWAY
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant: T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner: MARCUS SMITH
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VILCHUCK v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv02243
Plaintiff: SETH VILCHUCK
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?