Cases 41 - 50 of 412
HILL et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
DESTINY HILL, MARY JOHNSON, ASHLEIGH SANTIAGO and others
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASKO et al v. STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
DAVID PASKO, LASHAWAN TOMPKINS, GRAYLON BELL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS OF VIGO COUNTY, BILL WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HOWARD v. WEDDELL et al
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOWARD
Defendant:
BRANDON WEDDELL and JOHN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABEL v. VANTLIN et al
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID ABEL
Defendant:
DOUG VANTLIN, NOBLE PARISH, DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. LIEBEL et al
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL, A. WENCE and FAUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE JR v. MYERS
as 1:2022cv02310
Plaintiff:
DAVID W LEE JR
Defendant:
MATTHEW MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, ZUBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv02233
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANDERS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
