Cases 101 - 110 of 1,364
RODGERS et al v. WEBER INC. et al
as 4:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
ANDREW RODGERS and MARIA E. RODGERS
Defendant:
WEBER INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOOSA v. FLORISTS' MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LOOSA
Defendant:
FLORISTS' MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMES v. BUSACR et al
as 1:2021cv02842
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. AMES
Defendant:
JOHN BUSACR, ADAM DE BOTH, ANDREW DENSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAPETANIOS v. SHEPHERD et al
as 1:2021cv02843
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL KAPETANIOS, SR.
Defendant:
JACKSON SHEPHERD, TONY KUMMER, ANDREW PLANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MORGANSTERN v. COOK INCORPORATED, et al.
as 1:2021cv02643
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MORGANSTERN
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL GROUP, INC., COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
BOWES-NORTHERN v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC., et al
as 1:2021cv02617
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.,, CORIE BARRY, ANDREW BONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARTLETT v. MONTGOMERY CO. COURT SYSTEM et al
as 1:2021cv02584
Plaintiff:
JEREMY M. BARTLETT
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY CO. COURT SYSTEM, DANIEL G. PETRIE, HARRY A. SIAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREW v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02549
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANDREW
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and MICHAEL MITCHEFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. OOSHIRTS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02519
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas and ANDY
Defendant:
ooShirts, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
