Cases 11 - 20 of 93
DIKE v. BALDREE
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
NOAH ISAIAH DIKE
Defendant:
JOSH BALDTREE and JOSH BALDREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNY v. BOWLING et al
as 2:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBERT DENNY
Defendant:
TYLER BOWLING and JOSH PAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. HILL
Defendant:
HUNTER GAMBILL, JOHNNIE BOHNERT, JOSH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MICKLES v. ROMONOV et al
as 2:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
JOSH ROMONOV, LISA MANNER, HELINA PRIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. SHERIFF SCOTTY MAPLES et al
as 4:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRUCE BAKER
Defendant:
SHERIFF SCOTTY MAPLES, DET. JOSH BANET, SGT. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. COUCH et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
CHRIS COUCH, TOM FOUST, JOSH SCHERSCHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEITH v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
GARRETT ALLEN KEITH
Defendant:
RICHARD DIXON, JOSH BABCOCK, JOSEPH GEHL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEITH v. GEHL et al
as 4:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
GARRETT ALLEN KEITH
Defendant:
JOSEPH "JOE" GEHL, JOSEPH MONTESANTO, DYLON ALLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OJO v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Oluwaseun Abel Ojo
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and Josh Sutton
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
CHAMBERS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
