Cases 11 - 20 of 2,638
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARAHAN
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Karel Farahan, in her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham Farahan and KAREL FARAHAN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARAHAN
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Farahan
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $39,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$39,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
GISLER v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW THOMAS GISLER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
JALEN DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SCOTT v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
LUKE JOHN SCOTT, SR.
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, WOLF and DIRECTOR OF THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
