Cases 41 - 50 of 218
MILLS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2021cv00088
Defendant:
BRENT MILLER, INDIANA STATE POLICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARSON v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2021cv00805
Defendant:
JOEL LYTTLE, DAVID E COREY, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE CARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS et al v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
WALTER NICHOLS and TINA NICHOLS
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
WALTER MITCHELL and DEBRA MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALTERS v. DOE et al
as 1:2021cv00072
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. d/b/a Sam's Club and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
JANICE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, INC. et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2020cv00659
Defendant:
BRUCE JOHNSON, WALTER ANTHONY GREGORY, THOMAS MCDONOUGH and others
Plaintiff:
INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, INC. and INDEV GAUGING SYSTEMS, INC.
MASON v. SHERIFF OF MADISON COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv02987
Defendant:
BLAKE CALLAHAN, SHERIFF OF MADISON COUNTY, JONATHAN WALTERS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE MASON, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. MELLINGER et al
as 1:2020cv02908
Defendant:
LEE, SARA ABSENGER, SANDY FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRISTOPEIT v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02804
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
WALTER R. KRISTOPEIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs
BEAVER, JR. v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2020cv02784
Defendant:
PAMELA S. PARRISH, JEFFREY S. LEFFLER and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. BEAVER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
