Cases 1 - 10 of 39
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ICENOGLE et al v. AMOS et al
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Judith Icenogle, JOHN PATTERSON and A. G.
Defendant:
Kyle Amos and OSTLUND A SERVICE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JAMES v. HARMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
TYWAN JAMES
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMAN, AMANDA TERRY, KOSHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMOS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN M. AMOS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HAMILTON v. AMO TRUCKING, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
MARLON HAMILTON
Defendant:
AMO TRUCKING, LLC and MURSAL KULMIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AMOS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2021cv00264
Defendant:
NURSE KIMBERLY HOBSON, NURSE L. CUPP, WEXFORD CORR. SERV. and others
Plaintiff:
ROYAL AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP LP v. NR BREA MALL, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01464
Plaintiff:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP LP
Defendant:
TERRY TANG, NR BREA MALL, LLC, ANNA CHU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AMOS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
EVERETT AMOS and EVERETT G. AMOS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARNSWORTH v. HUERKAMP et al
as 1:2020cv02259
Plaintiff:
GEMINI FARNSWORTH
Defendant:
STEVE SAUCERMAN, DIANE HUERKAMP, DON STULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
