Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOWENS v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv01453
Petitioner:
COREY BOWENS
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWEN v. ISON et al
as 1:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
SAM BOWEN and CITY OF GREENWOOD, INDIANA
Defendant:
JAMES ISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv02370
Plaintiff:
TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP SR
Defendant:
COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. STATE OF INDIANA IDOC et al
as 1:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
OSCAR K. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA IDOC, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Defendant:
ADULT DETENTION CENTER, C.O SAUERS, WELLPATH COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2022cv01683
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Defendant:
BOWEN, HAMBLEM, STOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIDER v. COLUMBIA INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01520
Plaintiff:
KARI GRIDER
Defendant:
COLUMBIA INSURANCE COMPANY and REESE BOWEN
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP, SR.
Defendant:
COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONALDSON v. DUGAN et al
as 1:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
AARON DONALDSON
Defendant:
DUGAN, PRUET, PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
