Cases 1 - 10 of 19
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHLOE WARGNY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPPELL v. RHODES et al
as 2:2020cv00686
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FCI DENTIST, RHODES and VAN WAGNER
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COLBY CHAPPELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAPPELL v. BOP
as 2:2020cv00224
Defendant:
BOP EMPLOYEES, et al.
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COLBY CHAPPELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPPELL v. FEDERAL BOP et al
as 2:2020cv00024
Petitioner:
BRYAN C. CHAPPELL
Respondent:
FEDERAL BOP and LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAPPELLE v. WILSON et al
as 2:2018cv00540
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON and DAVID LUKENS
Plaintiff:
DON CHAPPELLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENNELL et al v. LVNV FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03304
Plaintiff:
MIRTA ALVARADO, LAURA JEAN STEWART, FRANCIS EMERY and others
Defendant:
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP and LVNV FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WILEY v. CHAPPELL et al
as 1:2018cv01919
Defendant:
ROBERT CHAPPELL and JOHN/JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
DANNY WILEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHAPPELL et al
as 1:2018cv00943
Defendant:
ANTONIO CHAPPELL and G & A TAX SERVICE, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
CHAPPELL v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERV. et al
as 2:2017cv00552
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, BARBARA RIGGS, REGINA ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
SHAMIR CHAPPELL
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
