Cases 1 - 10 of 79
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUTCHINSON et al v. NALE et al
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVID HUTCHINSON and SARAH HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
REBECCA NALE, KIMBERLY BYRUM, JAMIE JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMPSON v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SUE SIMPSON
Defendant:
TODD ROKITA, KATIE JENNER, PARK D. GRINDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
TURPIN v. OLD NATIONAL BANK
as 3:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
MARYETTA TURPIN
Defendant:
OLD NATIONAL BANK and SIMPSONS GROCERY STORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 1:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 1:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, I.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMPSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
SHAWN B. SIMPSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HAYES v. WITTMAN et al
as 1:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYES
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, I.D.O.C. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
