Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Fiscal Court of Anderson County et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
Fiscal Court of Anderson County, Fiscal Court of Bath County, Fiscal Court of Bell County and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Yates et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Carter Yates, Estill Lowe, Marty Little and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Union College
as 6:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Alexa Carter
Defendant:
Union College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hatmaker et al v. Rockcastle County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Nathan Carter, Rockcastle County, Kentucky, Suzanne Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Downs and Tristan Winstead
Executor:
Lucy Hatmaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2021cv00026
Defendant:
A. Carter, J. Price, M. Lefever and others
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Federal Medical Center
as 5:2021cv00048
Petitioner:
Corey L. Carter
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carter v. USA
as 5:2020cv00485
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Carter and Cory Carter
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00378
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harper v. GMS, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00312
Defendant:
GMS, Inc. and Carter Hardware Company doing business as Valley Interior Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dennis Harper
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Sunz Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
