Cases 61 - 70 of 842,719
Boyd v. Wilkey, Sr
as 7:2024cv05513
Plaintiff:
Latasha Monique Boyd and Latasha Boyd
Defendant:
Derrick S. Wilkey, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. v. Shockley Boys Contracting, LLC
as 1:2024cv01216
Unknown:
Kenneth Todd
Plaintiff:
Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Shockley Boys Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Osburn v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Magda Osburn
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Cervantes v. Swegles et al
as 3:2024cv02486
Defendant:
Troy Matthew Swegles and Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Susana Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Paz v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2024cv02479
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Paz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Curran v. Hall
as 4:2024cv03744
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Markia Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VPN Technology Holdings, LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
VPN Technology Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Fortinet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Good Clean Love, Inc. et al v. Epoch NE Corporation et al
as 2:2024mc00738
Plaintiff:
Good Clean Love and Vaginal Biome Science
Petitioner:
BPI Labs Inc
Defendant:
Epoch NE Corporation and Lawrence Luo
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Wright v. Harrisonburg Men's CCap/Diversion Center et al
as 7:2024cv00682
Defendant:
VDOC and Harrisonburg Men's CCap/Diversion Center
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wayne Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority
as 3:2024cv00887
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
