Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Maye v. McKinney
as 5:2022ct03438
Plaintiff:
Eddie R. Maye
Defendant:
Antonio McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Davis et al
as 5:2022ct03051
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dejuan McKinney
Defendant:
Dustin Davis, Winnfield City Police Dept., Johnny Ray Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 4:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Stella Hays, Gloria Alerez-Rothrock, Keith Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Rosie Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Stocko et al
as 5:2021ct03037
Plaintiff:
Roscoe McKinney
Defendant:
Jammie Stocko, Director of Prisons and Officer Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Herring
as 5:2020hc02051
Petitioner:
David Anthony McKinney
Respondent:
John A. Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McKinney v. Herring
as 5:2020hc02049
Petitioner:
David Anthony McKinney
Respondent:
John A. Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Pitt County Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv00114
Defendant:
Pitt County Detention Center, Officer Byrum and Sgt. McKinney
Plaintiff:
Maurice Edward Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Addison et al
as 5:2019ct03155
Defendant:
Steven Edward McKinney, Pitt County Detention Center, Deputy C.K. Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Earl Wilkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Bryant et al
as 5:2017hc02118
Petitioner:
Deequan McKinney
Respondent:
Frazelle Bryant and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinney v. Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company, et al
as 4:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. McKinney
Defendant:
Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company , Prudential Retirement Services, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
