Cases 11 - 17 of 17
WELLS v. PERSON COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY WELLS
Defendant:
PERSON COUNTY , DEWEY JONES , CAPT. CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHANDLER v. FORSYTH TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
HANNAH CHANDLER
Defendant:
FORSYTH TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NANCY RAPP, WARREN HODGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 120-2A JAMES ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS UNIT 2A, BLDG 5, CHANDLER PLACE CONDOMINIUMS, HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al
as 1:2011cv00739
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
120-2A JAMES ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS UNIT 2A, BLDG 5, CHANDLER PLACE CONDOMINIUMS, HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, $18,162.91 IN FUNDS FROM FIRST CITIZENS BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8244, IN THE NAME OF B J FOOD MART AND SOMCHIT MIXAYKHAM and FIRST CITIZENS BANK CASHIER'S CHECK NO. 08161189, IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,700.87, MADE PAYABLE TO KONGKEO KEOMOUNGKHOUN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
CAIN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00866
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CAIN , AUSTIN RODDEN , BROOKE TOMPKINS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ALEXANDER et al v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR., LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR., LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR. and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, DAVID WRAY, RANDALL BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
