Cases 21 - 30 of 112
CARTER et al v. ROUND POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00815
Plaintiff:
MARTHA CARTER and RONALD CARTER
Defendant:
ROUND POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING CORPORATION and DOES 1-20
CARTER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00727
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE CARTER, III
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LEANE v. CARTER
as 1:2021cv00514
Defendant:
WILLIAM RALPH CARTER, JR.
Plaintiff:
DR. DEIRDRE LEANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUTTON, et al v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
TAYLOR CARTER, PAUL HIGGINS, UNNAMED ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY K SUTTON and JUSTIN L. SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. MCDOUGLE et al
as 1:2020cv01084
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL HOWARD, III
Defendant:
C/O GIBSON, C/O EDWARDS, SGT. MCDOUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. MCDOUGLE et al
as 1:2020cv01180
Defendant:
C/O BURKE, C/O GIBSON, C/O EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL HOWARD, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al v. PETERMAN et al
as 1:2020cv00613
Plaintiff:
Gregory B. Drumwright, Destiny Clarke, Colleen Tenae Turner and others
Defendant:
AMY SCOTT GALEY, STEVE CARTER, MELODY WIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
Tracy Carter
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOUFFARD et al v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
as 1:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
BOUFFARD, TIARA SCOTT, MICHAEL WILSON and others
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWDEN v. 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OFFICE et al
as 1:2019cv01102
Defendant:
LISA S. COSTNER, DAVID SIPPRELL, OFFICE OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN BOWDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
