Cases 21 - 30 of 85
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
RICE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE and YEDIDIAH SHAKUR-EL
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, MAJOR MOORE, CAPTAIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. PEAK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
PEAK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, DAIRYLAND CORPORATION, DANNI STAMPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JARVIS v. GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv00875
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEON JARVIS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA and DANNY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LONG v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2021cv00672
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VAN LONG
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY CO. OF AMERICA and WELLPATH MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. HOEKSTRA
as 1:2021cv00616
Petitioner:
DANNY WILLIAM YOUNG
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOKS and CASANDRA SKINNER HOEKSTRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FORD v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
DANNY LAMORE FORD
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00488
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, PROSECTORIAL DISTRICT, J. CLARK FISCHER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. WELCH et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
SARA Q. LOBNER, KELLY WELCH, WILLIAM L. OSTEAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
