Cases 31 - 40 of 99
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. SEAGRAZE et al
as 1:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
MS. SEAGRAZE, SARGENT YOUNG, CAPTAIN ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE, LARRY JUNIOR MERIS and RAYMOND SCHOFIELD HYATT
Defendant:
SERGEANT CLARK, CAPTAIN JOHNSON, CAPTAIN SELLERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. AYISI et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
M. AYISI and CAPTAIN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEAGRAVES v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SEAGRAVES
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and CAPTAIN WILLIAM FLINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE and YEDIDIAH SHAKUR-EL
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, MAJOR MOORE, CAPTAIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00824
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHNSON, OFFICER SOUTHERN, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON v. BRITT et al
as 1:2021cv00853
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL NEWTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN BRITT, SERGEANT CLARK, SERGEANT BRIDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. FREEMAN
as 1:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III
Defendant:
CHRIS FREEMAN, CAPTAIN SHANE BULLINS, SHERIFF SAM SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
