Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 81 - 90 of 489
ARELLANOS-MORALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00392
Plaintiff: ANA CECILIA ARELLANOS-MORALES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PROCTOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00335
Petitioner: DANYEL PROCTOR
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00306
Petitioner: JASON TYWANN BELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $145,901.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2021cv00254
Defendant: CURRENCY $145,901.00 IN U.S.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
MCGHEE BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00227
Plaintiff: JOSEPH C. MCGHEE BEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $118,361.84 IN U.S. et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant: CURRENCY $118,361.84 IN U.S. and CURRENCY $1,215.00 IN U.S.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1955
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $78,780.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2021cv00108
Defendant: CURRENCY $78,780.00 IN U.S.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
POND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00083
Defendant: UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: Stephen K Pond and STEPHEN K. POND
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
HATFIELD EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00082
Plaintiff: NOBLE DERRANCE HATFIELD EL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFFIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00065
Plaintiff: ANTHONY RAVON RUFFIN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?