Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CONNOR v. UNC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
as 1:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
YAMICIA CONNOR
Defendant:
UNC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KADEL et al v. FOLWELL et al
as 1:2019cv00272
Plaintiff:
JASON FLECK, MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR., MAXWELL KADEL and others
Defendant:
DEE JONES, NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. SENTRY CASUALTY COMPANY, et al
as 1:2018cv00932
Defendant:
ROBERT JOSEPH ELLIS, COVIL CORPORATION, Darrell Connor and others
Plaintiff:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ROUDABUSH v. HOLLEMBAEK et al
as 1:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH
Defendant:
S. HOLLEMBAEK, SINGLETON, LASSITER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CONNOR v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FRANKLIN CONNOR
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , BW/IP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
VAN DYKE v. FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC, STATE OF NC DOC, G. BILYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. WEBSTER et al
as 1:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
JOE WEBSTER, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, PATRICIA S. CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEATHERS v. ZIKO
as 1:2014cv00828
Plaintiff:
ANDREA C. WEATHERS
Defendant:
THOMAS J. ZIKO , GREGORY CONNOR , HERBERT B. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
