Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SIDES v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SIDES
Defendant:
BOBBY KIMBROUGH, JOHN DOE CORPORATION, COUNTY OF FORSYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABRAHAM GERSHONOWICZ, D.D.S. AND JAMES NEME, D.D.S., P.C. v. MANISH MISTRY DDS, PLLC
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM GERSHONOWICZ, D.D.S. AND JAMES NEME, D.D.S., P.C. doing business as BRIGHT SIDE DENTAL
Defendant:
MANISH MISTRY DDS, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
SIDES, JR. v. JONES
as 1:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
EARNEST ANTHONY SIDES, JR.
Defendant:
ZACHARIE K. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00158
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIDES v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00674
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY B. SIDES
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
SIDES v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00659
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY B. SIDES
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
SIDES v. ADVANCE STORES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
as 1:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
LOUIS S. SIDES
Defendant:
ADVANCE STORES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sides v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00337
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, INC. , DOLLAR GENERAL PARTNERS , DOLGENCORP OF NEW YORK, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA SIDES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CHUBIRKO et al v. REVIS et al
as 1:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN LEE CHUBIRKO and JOHN MAE CHUBIRKO
Defendant:
LISA ANN REVIS and AMANDA SIMMONS SIDES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
