Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BENNETT v. WOOTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: DWAYNE BENNETT
Defendant: SERGEANT WOOTEN and OFFICER HINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COVINGTON v. MARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00673
Plaintiff: MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant: AMANDA MARRIS, KENDRA BLINN MONTGOMERY, ORLANDO F. HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANNON et al v. AUTOMONEY, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00877
Plaintiff: JENNIFER TAYLOR, JULIA HARRISON, BRIAN BREVARD and others
Defendant: AUTOMONEY, INC. and AUTOMONEY NORTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOTEN v. WOODS
as 1:2019cv00095
Petitioner: Roderick Jerome Wooten
Respondent: Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL V. SCHOOL BOARD OF ROBESON COUNTY, et al
as 1:2018cv00546
Plaintiff: BETTY JO LOCKLEAR HILL
Defendant: SCHOOL BOARD OF ROBESON COUNTY and SHENITA WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LUNSFORD v. GREEN et al
as 1:2018cv00249
Plaintiff: ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
Defendant: GRAHAM GREEN, HALL, MAX WOOTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BERTHA v. SAMISKI et al
as 1:2016cv00429
Plaintiff: LJ BERTHA, JR.
Defendant: SAMISKI, CAROL C. BOSHOLM and CYNTHIA J. WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAINES-WOOTEN v. HOME OF SECOND CHANCES, INC et al
as 1:2015cv00291
Plaintiff: GINA RAINES-WOOTEN
Defendant: JOSEPHINE OKEKE and MERCY HOME SERVICES, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILDS v. WOOTEN
as 1:2012cv01331
Plaintiff: CURTIS EUGENE WILDS
Defendant: WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOURSCHER v. CASSTEVENS et al
as 1:2007cv00663
Plaintiff: MARK TOURSCHER
Defendant: LEON CASSTEVENS, KIM CLARK PHILLIPS, ALLEN SNEED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?