Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Harrison v. USA
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Harrison
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Riehl et al v. EnergyUnited et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph Riehl and Amie Riehl
Defendant:
EnergyUnited, Thomas Golden, Alec Natt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Simon et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Katherine Hord Simon, Tammy H. Hightower, Donald J. Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Wallenstein et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
Marc A. Wallenstein, William A. Harrison, Leslie E. Osbourne, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Murray et al
as 5:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harrison Moore
Defendant:
FNU Murray, FNU Daves, FNU Kale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamrick et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Michelle Hamrick and Hayley Harrison
Defendant:
Rutherford County, John K Carroll, Kimber Dover-Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. Harrison
as 3:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
William A. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Kalk v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert Harrison Kalk
Defendant:
Quinten Miller, Jeffrey Littrell and Buncombe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Nicholson
as 1:2020cv00244
Plaintiff:
Marquis Dechane Harrison
Defendant:
Brandon Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
