Cases 71 - 80 of 886
Osborne-Franklin v. Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County et al
as 5:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Shauntae Osborne-Franklin
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County, Chris Amason, Blake Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shirley v. Harpe
as 5:2022cv01049
Petitioner:
William Shirley, IV
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solis v. Rankins
as 5:2022cv01037
Petitioner:
Gabriel Solis
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horsey v. Ranks
as 5:2022cv01021
Petitioner:
James Wells Horsey
Respondent:
William Ranks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00993
Petitioner:
Johnny William Burnett
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clouston v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
William Clouston
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Farrell v. Breidenstein et al
as 5:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Robert Farrell
Defendant:
FNU Breidenstein, FNU Ferrell, FNU Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blankenship et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
John Hayden Blankenship, Haylee Blankenship, Delsie Mae Pye and others
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ross
Defendant:
Greg Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Clayton
as 5:2022cv00904
Petitioner:
William Thomas Cox
Respondent:
Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
