Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NIXON v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK (DENTIST) et al
as 2:2023cv01806
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK (DENTIST), (ACTING) WARDEN ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL WARDEN, DOUG WILLIAMS (CEO) RENEWAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KAMINSKI v. WHITE DEER RUN INPATIENT REHAB et al
as 2:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAMINSKI
Defendant:
White Deer Run Inpatient Rehab, Doctor Wilson and CEO, White Deer Run Rehab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWELL v. WOOTEN et al
as 2:2022cv01446
Plaintiff:
SHARON K. POWELL
Defendant:
RYAN WOOTEN, STACEY VERSAW, ANTHONY GRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
TWITTY v. BARNS et al
as 3:2020cv00142
Defendant:
TERRI SECHRENGOST, CASEY THORNLEY, DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY S. TWITTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LOCKHART v. RETIRE-SALEPERSON et al
as 1:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
CARL EDWARD LOCKHART
Defendant:
RETIRE-SALEPERSON, DOCTOR-CEO, ENGENEER-MANGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINKES v. MCADAM et al
as 2:2013cv01745
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH AND DAVID HINKES
Defendant:
LOWELL C. MCADAM , VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. , URSULA BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CRITTONDEN v. GROVE
as 1:2009cv00246
Plaintiff:
GREG CRITTONDEN
Defendant:
WILLIAM GROVE, CEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
