Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HODGES v. KOLOSOVSKY
as 2:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE L. HODGES
Defendant:
GHEORGHIY KOLOSOVSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
PATTON v. STAMPER et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
OMARI PATTON
Defendant:
KEITH STAMPER, CRAIG HALLER and JENNIFER HODGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HODGE v. BRYNER
as 2:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HODGE
Defendant:
BRYNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HODGES v. BURKHART
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JESSIE HODGES
Defendant:
NATHAN BURKHART and ERIE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HODGES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 1:2022cv00367
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HODGES
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE OLIVER
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HODGE v. CITY OF UNIONTOWN et al
as 2:2021cv01924
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE HODGE
Defendant:
CITY OF UNIONTOWN, MARTIN GATTI, KIMBERLY MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N.H. et al v. WILKINS TOWNSHIP
as 2:2020cv01872
Defendant:
WILKINS TOWNSHIP
Plaintiff:
MERI KAY HODGES, N.H. and SHARON HODGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HODGE v. CITY OF UNIONTOWN et al
as 2:2020cv00025
Defendant:
CITY OF UNIONTOWN, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S), MARTIN GATTI and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE HODGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HODGES v. U.S. POST OFFICE
as 2:2019cv01501
Defendant:
U.S. POST OFFICE
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HODGES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
