Cases 1 - 10 of 18
WASHINGTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, LIEUTENANT J. WALKER, SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAJAB et al v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv00774
Defendant:
MATAEO GARNER, WESTMORELAND COUNTY, NICOLE KAMER and others
Plaintiff:
IEESHA RAJAB and T. D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKLAND v. CARCELLA et al
as 2:2020cv00396
Defendant:
JOHN DOE NO. 3, MICHAEL CARCELLA, JOHN DOE NO. 4 and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WINTHROP BURKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KLINGER v. MAYO et al
as 1:2019cv00368
Defendant:
MONITORS JOHN DOE 1, 2, & 3 and MONITOR MAYO
Plaintiff:
RYAN KLINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01305
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY CESARINO, JOHN RIVETTO and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. NEWELL et al
as 1:2018cv00377
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BILL HARMON, JOHN DOES 1-2 and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JEFFERY NEWELL
Plaintiff:
LORI BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAKE et al v. CITY OF SHARON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00957
Plaintiff:
SHAWN R. HAKE and CYNTHIA L. LOYA
Defendant:
CITY OF SHARON POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN DOE NUMBER 1 , JOHN DOE NUMBER 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RUBY v. RUSH et al
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RUBY
Defendant:
CRAIG RUSH, BELINDA STILLMAN , FRANK QUINN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
VORA v. MICHAELS et al
as 3:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant:
DON MICHAELS, J. WHITE, CRAIG FOUST and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
