Cases 1 - 10 of 2,474
SLAMPAK et al v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
STEVEN K. SLAMPAK and PAMELA J. SLAMPAK
Defendant:
HENRY L. SIMMONS and WESTERN EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
DEVLIEGER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
CARL L DEVLIEGER
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN and PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DANKO et al v. D & G STEEL, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DANKO and DANIELLE L. HARSHMAN
Defendant:
D & G STEEL, INC., JOHN D. NOVAK and LLILAULIH A. EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
CRITTEN v. BRYAN-HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
GERALD L. CRITTEN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR LENA BRYAN-HENDERSON and PUBLIC DEFENDER ALEXA GRISTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritts v. Blair County Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Merritts
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., ABBIE TATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Shonn L Miller
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
FRYE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L FRYE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHICKIS, JR. v. CAMPBELL et al
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CHICKIS, JR.
Defendant:
DARYL L CAMPBELL and CANONSBURG-HOUSTON JOINT SEWER AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Burk v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Burk
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
JENKINS v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JANET L JENKINS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, Warden PHILLIP SHAFFER, Doctor JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
